Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBrosa-Rodríguez, Antoni
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-02T10:28:11Z
dc.date.available2026-01-02T10:28:11Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-30
dc.identifier.issn1731-7533
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11089/57153
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the distribution and characteristics of three linguistic structures across three different semantic types of adjectives in English: opinion-based (evaluative), mixed (dimensional), and non-opinion (objective) adjectives. While previous research has explored the perception of subjective adjectives in varied linguistic environments through experimental methods, our research provides quantitative corpus-based evidence from Universal Dependencies English corpora. The analysis focuses on three syntactic structures: modification of a noun (Adj+Noun), predicative construction with nexus (Nexus+Cop+Adj), and predicative construction with noun subject (Noun+Cop+Adj). Results reveal significant patterns: opinion adjectives display greater structural flexibility, appearing with meaningful frequency in both attributive and predicative positions, while dimensional adjectives strongly favor attributive position. The study also identifies consistent positional patterns across all adjective types, with attributive structures typically appearing later in sentences than predicative constructions. Furthermore, register variations were observed, with web language showing distinctive distributional patterns for opinion adjectives compared to more varied texts.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiegopl
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch in Languageen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
dc.subjectevaluative adjectivesen
dc.subjectsyntactic distributionen
dc.subjectopinion markersen
dc.subjectcorpus linguisticsen
dc.subjectinformation structureen
dc.titleLinguistically Packaging Opinion: A Quantitative Token-Based Analysis of Adjective Structures in Englishen
dc.typeArticle
dc.page.number354-374
dc.contributor.authorAffiliationUniversitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona (Spain)en
dc.referencesBaker, Linda and Jody L. Wagner. 1987. Evaluating information for truthfulness: The effects of logical subordination. Memory and Cognition, 15(3), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197723en
dc.referencesBiber, Douglas and Susan Conrad. 2019. Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136en
dc.referencesBiber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.en
dc.referencesBolinger, Dwight. 1967. Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua, 18, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(67)90018-6en
dc.referencesHarris, Jesse A. and Christopher Potts. 2009. Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives. Linguistics & Philosophy, 32(6), 523-552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9070-5en
dc.referencesHuddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316423530en
dc.referencesKaiser, Elsi and Catherine Wang. 2021. Packaging information as fact versus opinion: Consequences of the (information-)structural position of subjective adjectives. Discourse Processes, 58(7), 617-641. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2020.1838196en
dc.referencesKennedy, Christopher. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30(1), 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0en
dc.referencesKennedy, Christopher. 2013. Two sources of subjectivity: Qualitative assessment and dimensional uncertainty. Inquiry, 56(2-3), 258-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2013.784483en
dc.referencesKölbel, Max. 2004. Faultless disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 104(1), 53-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00081.xen
dc.referencesLambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607en
dc.referencesLasersohn, Peter. 2005. Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6), 643-686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-005-0596-xen
dc.referencesNivre, Joakim, Daniel Zeman, Filip Ginter and Francis Tyers. 2017. Universal Dependencies. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Tutorial Abstracts.en
dc.referencesPotts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273829.001.0001en
dc.referencesSassoon, Galit W. 2013. A typology of multidimensional adjectives. Journal of Semantics, 30(3), 335-380. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs012en
dc.referencesSzmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2005. Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(1), 113-150. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113en
dc.referencesUmbach, Carla. 2016. Evaluative propositions and subjective judgments. In C. Meier & J. van Wijnbergen-Huitink (Eds.), Subjective meaning: Alternatives to relativism, 127-168. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110402001-008en
dc.referencesVallduví, Enric and Elisabet Engdahl. 1996. The linguistic realization of information packaging. Linguistics, 34(3), 459-519. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1996.34.3.459en
dc.referencesWulff, Stefanie. 2003. A multifactorial corpus analysis of adjective order in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 245-282. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.8.2.04wulen
dc.contributor.authorEmailantoni.brosa@urv.cat
dc.identifier.doi10.18778/1731-7533.23.22
dc.relation.volume23


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0